W.B.Yeats's Poems

 W.B.Yeats’s Poems

Hello everyone, This blog is responded  of thinking activity task assigned by Head of the Dept. Dr Dilip Barad For further reading Click Here

# Compare the treatment of war in On Being Asked for a War Poem with other war poems by Wilfred Owen or Siegfried Sassoon.

The poetry of World War I is now synonymous with visceral depictions of the horrors and futility of war. Among the most prominent poets, Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen both faced brutal realities of war head-on and rejected the romanticized ideals of society. They exposed the emotional and physical toll that war had on soldiers through their works. In this blog, we will examine Sassoon's On Being Asked for a War Poem, Owen's war poems like Dulce et Decorum Est, and Sassoon's The Hero to show the basis of how each poet questions the luster of war and how it devastates the scenario.

Yeats’s On Being Asked for a War Poem presents a subtle response to the turmoil of war. He does not glorify it or condemn it outright but implies that poetry should transcend the immediate and political and focus on the universal. His reticence contrasts starkly with the visceral and vivid depictions of war found in the works of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon. While Yeats's poem questions the role of art in times of conflict, Owen's Dulce et Decorum Est and Sassoon's The General engage directly with the realities of war, exposing its horrors and criticizing those who perpetuate it.

In Dulce et Decorum Est, Owen's brutal imagery—"like a man in fire or lime"—brings the physical suffering of soldiers into sharp relief. His poetry condemns the romanticized ideals of war by contrasting them with the grotesque realities. Sassoon's The General uses satire to expose the incompetence of military leadership. Yeats, by refusing to write about the war directly, opens up questions as to whether poetry should engage with the political moment or remain above it. This divergence marks a broader debate about the role of art in times of crisis.

 #Write a modernist-inspired poem reflecting on a contemporary global crisis, drawing on Yeats’s themes and techniques.

Fragmented Borders
Between the steel and screen, a faceless storm,
Boundaries dissolve into binary ghosts.
Oceans churn, not with salt but silicon,
Whispers coded, carried on an invisible tide.

Under skies no longer sky, but haze,
A child’s cry breaks through the algorithmic hum.
The earth shifts; tectonic pixels crack,
And cities fall, not in flames, but in silence.

Where is the falconer when falcons drift
Through fiber-optic veins, seeking no prey?
Vision blurs in a thousand screens,
And the second coming streams live, buffering. (#Chatgpt)

#Do you agree with Yeats’s assertion in 'On Being Asked for a War Poem' that poetry should remain apolitical? Why or why not?

In On Being Asked for a War Poem, Yeats argues that poetry should not be harnessed for political purposes, stating, "I think it better that in times like these / A poet's mouth be silent." This assertion reflects Yeats's belief in the transcendent and universal role of poetry. However, this stance is open to debate.

One could argue that poetry inherently reflects the time in which it is created, making it difficult to remain apolitical. Works by Owen and Sassoon, for instance, show how poetry can serve as a powerful medium for critique and advocacy. Their vivid portrayals of war challenge societal norms and provoke critical thought, suggesting that poetry’s engagement with the political can deepen its impact. On the other hand, what Yeats sees is an opportunity for readers to ponder whether it is precisely this distance from pressing concerns that makes art timeless.

Ultimately, the question of whether poetry should stay apolitical depends on what it is intended to do. If it is intended to inspire, provoke, or document, then its political involvement is part and parcel of what it does. Yeats's position, though noble, may underestimate what poetry can both transcend and connect with the immediate.

 #How does Yeats use imagery to convey a sense of disintegration in 'The Second Coming'?

Yeats's The Second Coming uses powerful imagery to capture a world coming apart, which gives a sense of deep disintegration. Immediately in the opening lines, chaos is established: "Turning and turning in the widening gyre / The falcon cannot hear the falconer." The image of a falcon spiraling out of control symbolizes a loss of order and connection, suggesting humanity's descent into chaos.

The line "things fall apart; the centre cannot hold" encapsulates the poem's central theme of disintegration. This metaphor of a collapsing center reflects the broader societal and spiritual upheaval Yeats perceived in the aftermath of World War I. The imagery intensifies with "mere anarchy is loosed upon the world," evoking a vision of chaos as both pervasive and uncontrollable.

Yeats continues by describing the "rough beast" slouching towards Bethlehem to further enhance the apocalyptic tone. The "shape with lion body and the head of a man" forms a nightmarish image by blending human and animal features to portray a monstrous transformation that is inevitable. This creature epitomizes a new, unwholesome era, hence reiterating the sense of foreboding from the poem.

Through these vivid and haunting images, Yeats communicates a disintegration of traditional structures into the birth of a future that has no clear certainties. What makes this truly timeless is that he can put together mythological and contemporary pieces to explore this collapse and revival of society among readers across time.